Subsea Cables & Internet Infrastructure

The Pacific and Southeast Asia have two major telecom hubs: Tokyo and Singapore. Tokyo's status reflects its importance as the capital of one of Asia's largest economies with huge trade and financial flows with the United States as well as a defense treaty. Tokyo dominates Japan like Paris does France. Singapore's emergence reflects Hong Kong's downfall due to the Chinese government's failure to honor its commitment to HK autonomy. China requires any political candidate for HK office to be approved by it. Hence every HK politician is de facto a Beijing puppet. Secondly, China's security laws allow the arrest of anyone criticizing the Chinese government. The collapse of HK's rule of law is illustrated by numerous arrests of anyone peacefully opposing the government. You can go to jail for wearing a T-shirt advocating HK independence. In contrast, Singapore is neutral in the geopolitical war between the US and China and its judges are independen...

GNC is Guam's main carrier neutral data center. It doubles as a cable landing station. Usable colo space is 650 square meters. It has access to 2 megawatts. Guam's main energy source is diesel. A couple cables house their network equipment at the facility, including the Japan-Guam-Australia North and South networks (Google). The main problem for carriers considering Guam is that the PTT controls metro connectivity between the cable landing stations and data centers. The incumbent TeleGuam is a problem because it charges 10 to 20 times the kilometer rate as in developed Western cities like Amsterdam. A 100G metro wave ranges from $5K to $8K per month. That is more than 20% the cost of 100G waves from Singapore to Guam. One can get a dark fibre pair between Amsterdam data centres for 300 to 400 Euros a month. Guam offers the Pacific something it badly needs, a third telecom hub. Not an important place for peering, but ...

Marseille with its 16 cables tightly squeezed into reserved sea lanes and landing facilities violates the cardinal rule of network diversity. It's highly efficient, but resiliency requires physical diversity. In general, resiliency costs money because it requires not relying solely on the big interconnection points. Indeed, there is a fundamental conflict between minimizing network costs and maximizing performance. This has led consortiums and the digital titans to seek other landing points to reduce Marseille's importance. Besides being a long distance from Marseille and on a separate power grid, Genoa offers lower latency access to Italy's eyeballs as well as Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Scandinavia, and Eastern Europe. The city offers clear advantages for a landing spot.  On the down side, landing cables at Genoa is more challenging than Marseille because cables must traverse more shallow waters to reach it. Cables must be threaded between Sardinia, Corsica, and Italy....