Improving The Resiliency of Your Singapore Connectivity: The Challenge

Building a resilient Layer 1 network where Singapore is a major POP is very difficult. Most subsea cables land in Singapore via designated sea lanes with four to five cables per lane. This increases the risk of a dragged anchor taking many cables. Although over the last ten years there have been few or none such incidents, a network planner is judged on future performance and proper risk management. Moreover, most subsea cables land at subsea cable landing stations (only 4 in total) serving many other cables. So dividing traffic among several cables is not good enough if resiliency is the goal.

Tuas CLS: Apricot, Asia Direct Cable, Bifrost, I-2SEA, I2I, IAX, Indigo West, INSICA, MIST, MVISTA, PEACE, SEA-H2X, SMW4, SMW5, SMW6, SJC, & UMO.

Tanna Merah: SEAX-1, BJC2, BJC3, & ASC.

Changi North: AAG, BSCS, CANDLE, C2C, Echo, JAKABARE, MIC-1, RISING 8, TGN-IA, TGN-INDICOM, & TIS.

Changi South: APG, ASE, C2C, MATRIX, & SJC2.

Cable landing diversity is extremely hard to achieve. Moreover, sea lane diversity is impossble. However, in the next installment, I will give some tips to mitigate the single point of failure risks that abound in Singapore. 

Map of the Fibre Optic Subsea Cables Landing in Singapore


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The British Empire's Resilient Subsea Telegraph Network

The Short Life Expectancy of Starlink's LEO Satellites

Here We Go Again: Several Major Cables Down Off Yemen